Blond-Amsterdam is known for their 'cute' and 'feminine' tableware designs. Over the years they have taken over nearly every cupboard of Dutch white cis women with their plates and teapots. The cuteness of Blond-Amsterdam can give the impression that the brand is innocent and harmless.
It is in fact neither innocent nor harmless. For example, in Blond-Amsterdam published a cartoon during the national elections stereotyping voting women. The outrage about their sexist stereotyping was widespread, even reaching the national news. Unfortunately the main focus of this outrage was only about the misrepresentation of white cis women, while the oppression of the visual language of Blond-Amsterdam goes far beyond that. Blond-Amsterdam has been complicit in criminalizing sexworkers in their artworks, they sell tableware featuring blackfacing-imagery and other forms of racism.
They have cutified the meat industry, the destructive aviation industry and capitalism in general. They glorified colonialism and nationalism. They spread cis hetero sexism, fatphobia and ableism. It is a normalisation of various interlinked forms of oppression. This normalisation is part of a Dutch tradition of - as Gloria Wekker coined the term - white innocence, which has enabled oppressive culture to stay alive and multiply since the colonial times. The white cis woman Karel de Kleijne has, inspired by Wekker, as a personal project mapped the oppressive narrative of Blond-Amsterdam, and made an activist parody of the plates of Blond-Amsterdam as a form of creative resistance.
On the 20th of september she will share the story of Blond-Amsterdam and present the alternative parody tableware. As a closure of the evening, a discussion night has been organized in collaboration with Feminist Club Amsterdam. The results of this discussion will be added to the later published public call out of Blond-Amsterdam. Blond-Amsterdam staat bekend om hun 'schattige' en 'vrouwelijke' servies, en heeft over de jaren met hun bordjes en theepotten bijna alle keukenkastjes van nederlandse cis witte vrouwen veroverd.
De schattigheid van Blond-Amsterdam geeft misschien een idee van onschuld of onschadelijkheid, dat is het absoluut niet. De verontwaardiging over deze seksistische stereotypering was groot en haalde zelfs het landelijke nieuws. Helaas focuste deze verontwaardiging zich voornamelijk op de misrepresentatie van de witte cis vrouw, terwijl de onderdrukking in de beeldtaal van Blond-Amsterdam veel verder gaat dan dat. Zo heeft Blond-Amsterdam zich schuldig gemaakt aan het criminaliseren van sekswerkers, verkopen ze blackfacing-afbeeldingen en andere vormen van racisme, maakten ze schattig propaganda voor de vleesindustrie, luchtvaartindustrie en kapitalisme in het algemeen, verheerlijken ze kolonialisme en nationalisme, en verspreidden cis heteroseksisme, vetfobie en validisme.
